Q5. What is meant by inductive reasoning? Provide examples regarding the application of his method in a classroom setting?
Inductive reasoning is a logical process in which multiple premises, all believed true or found true most of the time, are combined to obtain a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is often used in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or behavior. Here is an example:
• Every tornado I have ever seen in the United States rotated counterclockwise, and I have seen dozens of them.
• We see a tornado in the distance, and we are in the United States.
• I conclude that the tornado we see right now must be rotating counterclockwise.
A meteorologist will tell you that in the United States (which lies in the northern hemisphere),
most tornadoes rotate counterclockwise, but not all of them do. Therefore, the conclusion is probably true, but not necessarily true. Inductive reasoning is, unlike deductive reasoning, not logically rigorous. Imperfection can exist and inaccurate conclusions can occur, however rare; in deductive reasoning, the conclusions are mathematically certain. Inductive reasoning is sometimes confused with mathematical induction, an entirely different process.
Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning, in which logical certainties are "daisy chained" to derive a general conclusion about an infinite number of objects or situations.
What's inductive reasoning, and why is it important in the workplace? Inductive reasoning is a
type of logical thinking that involves forming generalizations based on specific incidents you've experienced, observations you've made, or facts you know to be true or false.
Inductive reasoning is different from deductive reasoning, in which you start with a generalization or theory, and then test it by applying it to specific incidents.
Inductive reasoning is an important critical thinking skill that many employers look for in their
employees. Therefore, it is a useful skill to highlight in your job applications and in your job interviews.
Inductive reasoning is an example of a soft skill. Unlike hard skills, which are specific to your
job and generally involve acquired knowledge, and soft skills related to how you interact with people, social situations, and ideas.
Both hard and soft skills are essential for success in the workplace, but soft skills are arguably
harder to teach and learn … which is why many employers place such a premium on hiring
candidates who possess these skills and can demonstrate them during the interview process.
Employers value workers who can think logically as they solve problems and carry out tasks, and who can discern patterns and develop strategies, policies, or proposals based on those tendencies. These employees are practicing inductive reasoning.
In practice, inductive reasoning often appears invisible. You might not be aware that you’re
taking in information, recognizing a potential pattern, and then acting on your hypothesis –
but if you’re a good problem solver, chances are that these examples will feel familiar:
1. A teacher notices that his students learn more when hands-on activities are incorporated into lessons, and then decides to regularly include a hands-on component in his future lessons.
2. An architect discerns a pattern of cost overages for plumbing materials in jobs and opts to
increase the estimate for plumbing costs in subsequent proposals.
3. A stock broker observes that Intuit stock increased in value four years in a row during tax
season and recommends a buy to clients in March.
4. A recruiter conducts a study of recent hires who have achieved success and stayed on with the organization. She finds that they graduated from three local colleges, so she decides to focus recruiting efforts on those schools.
5. A salesperson presents testimonials of current customers to suggest to prospective clients
that her products are high quality and worth the purchase.
6. A defense attorney reviews the strategy employed by lawyers in similar cases and finds an
approach that has consistently led to acquittals. She then applies this approach to her own
case.
Answer:Course: General Methods of Teaching
Course code 8601
Level: B.Ed Solved Assignment
Inductive reasoning is a logical process in which multiple premises, all believed true or found true most of the time, are combined to obtain a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is often used in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or behavior. Here is an example:
• Every tornado I have ever seen in the United States rotated counterclockwise, and I have seen dozens of them.
• We see a tornado in the distance, and we are in the United States.
• I conclude that the tornado we see right now must be rotating counterclockwise.
A meteorologist will tell you that in the United States (which lies in the northern hemisphere),
most tornadoes rotate counterclockwise, but not all of them do. Therefore, the conclusion is probably true, but not necessarily true. Inductive reasoning is, unlike deductive reasoning, not logically rigorous. Imperfection can exist and inaccurate conclusions can occur, however rare; in deductive reasoning, the conclusions are mathematically certain. Inductive reasoning is sometimes confused with mathematical induction, an entirely different process.
Mathematical induction is a form of deductive reasoning, in which logical certainties are "daisy chained" to derive a general conclusion about an infinite number of objects or situations.
What's inductive reasoning, and why is it important in the workplace? Inductive reasoning is a
type of logical thinking that involves forming generalizations based on specific incidents you've experienced, observations you've made, or facts you know to be true or false.
Inductive reasoning is different from deductive reasoning, in which you start with a generalization or theory, and then test it by applying it to specific incidents.
Inductive reasoning is an important critical thinking skill that many employers look for in their
employees. Therefore, it is a useful skill to highlight in your job applications and in your job interviews.
Inductive Reasoning in the Workplace
Inductive reasoning is an example of a soft skill. Unlike hard skills, which are specific to your
job and generally involve acquired knowledge, and soft skills related to how you interact with people, social situations, and ideas.
Both hard and soft skills are essential for success in the workplace, but soft skills are arguably
harder to teach and learn … which is why many employers place such a premium on hiring
candidates who possess these skills and can demonstrate them during the interview process.
Employers value workers who can think logically as they solve problems and carry out tasks, and who can discern patterns and develop strategies, policies, or proposals based on those tendencies. These employees are practicing inductive reasoning.
Examples of Inductive Reasoning
In practice, inductive reasoning often appears invisible. You might not be aware that you’re
taking in information, recognizing a potential pattern, and then acting on your hypothesis –
but if you’re a good problem solver, chances are that these examples will feel familiar:
1. A teacher notices that his students learn more when hands-on activities are incorporated into lessons, and then decides to regularly include a hands-on component in his future lessons.
2. An architect discerns a pattern of cost overages for plumbing materials in jobs and opts to
increase the estimate for plumbing costs in subsequent proposals.
3. A stock broker observes that Intuit stock increased in value four years in a row during tax
season and recommends a buy to clients in March.
4. A recruiter conducts a study of recent hires who have achieved success and stayed on with the organization. She finds that they graduated from three local colleges, so she decides to focus recruiting efforts on those schools.
5. A salesperson presents testimonials of current customers to suggest to prospective clients
that her products are high quality and worth the purchase.
6. A defense attorney reviews the strategy employed by lawyers in similar cases and finds an
approach that has consistently led to acquittals. She then applies this approach to her own
case.
Related Topics
Principles of Effective Teaching, and Four Aces of Effective Teaching
Curriculum offering during the period of the Holy Prophet (PBUH)
Reflect Some Common Qualities of Primary Teachers
Inductive Reasoning, and Examples Regarding Application Of His Method In Classroom Setting
Discuss Merits And Demerits Of Scientific Method
Steps of Planning “Development of Instruction"
Five Merits of Lesson Planning for Teachers in Education
Steps or Approaches to Lesson Planing
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have any question related to children education, teacher education, school administration or any question related to education field do not hesitate asking. I will try my best to answer. Thanks.